banner



Can Robots Used In Treatment Or Assistance Substitute For Animals?

A nursing home resident interacts with her robotic domestic dog companion.

All of u.s. who live with dogs know the many ways they benefit usa. Principal among them are companionship, love, affection, and a sense of calm and happiness. Numerous research projects accept studied these real, measurable effects and have unequivocally proven dogs' positive impact on both our health and well-being.

Recently, some in the world of health care are taking the concept a pace further by studying the benefits robotic animals may have for the elderly. Enquiry is finding that this traditionally isolated social grouping tin derive great solace from a robotic "pet." Though sometimes costly, they accept been shown to decrease stress and anxiety and reduce the need for pain and behavior-related medications.

In her September 26, 2020, "The New Old Age" column in the New York Times, Paula Span considered this phenomenon:

Long before the pandemic, loneliness and social disconnection were acknowledged public wellness bug for older people, linked to measurably poorer mental and concrete health. At present, their hazard for serious affliction from the coronavirus has denied many seniors the stimulation and comfort of personal visits, cultural events, volunteering, even grocery shopping.

GET THE BARK NEWSLETTER IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign upwardly and get the answers to your questions.

"Covid has created a bizarre world where nobody can hug everyone," said Laurie Orlov, a veteran industry analyst and founder of the newsletter Aging and Health Technology Sentinel. "The idea of a pet you lot can hold—a tactile feel—transcends that somewhat."

Difficult times oftentimes inspire innovation, and a scattering of institutions—among them, hospitals, nursing homes and assisted-living facilities—have adopted the utilize of robotic pets as companions for their patients. Because the Food and Drug Administration classifies the robot as a biofeedback device, Medicare will cover its purchase and use by therapists. (Nosotros aren't sure if this besides pertains to real, alive therapy pets; if it doesn't, it should.)

In one study, patients who were paired with a robotic pet were monitored over a six-calendar month period. The staff reported that the robots—"which caused names and, at holidays, festive outfits—helped calm residents, increased their social beliefs and improved mood and appetite."

At the high end, with a price tag of $half-dozen,120, is the PARO Therapeutic Robot (to a higher place), a popular model from Nippon, that mimics a baby harp seal in looks and behavior.

The robotic seal pup has sensors that register touch, light, sound, temperature and posture, and can perceive people and the environs. For example, its light sensor enables PARO to recognize light and night. The tactile sensor allows the robot to respond to beingness stroked, and the posture sensor, to being held. Its audio sensor allows information technology to recognize voice direction and words such as its name, greetings and praise.

A much less expensive (and simpler) device retails from $65 to $130 and is produced by Ageless Innovation, a spinoff of Hasbro. They offering dogs and cats who await very much similar traditional plush toys simply are specifically designed and marketed to families who "seek engaging products that foster meaningful connections through play, joy and happiness …." These battery-operated pets comprise built-in sensors and speakers that enable the devices to interact on a basic level. Features include a calming heartbeat, lifelike coat and authentic barking sounds that respond to the human voice.

Robotic pet companions were initially tested with adults diagnosed with dementia, the thought existence that those with reduced cognitive capacity would accept the robots as real animals. A 2017 randomized controlled trial that assessed the effectiveness of PARO pets with these individuals institute the animatronic seals to be helpful to those involved and, past extension, to their families and the institutions who cared for them.

After, when trials were run with seniors who were not similarly dumb simply were suffering from loneliness, positive results were too reported. It seems that having a beneficial relationship with a robotic pet does non require a suspended sense of reality.

These relationships have been compared to the relationship i may have had with a favorite doll or costly toy equally a child—which, for many, served as a beloved companion, confidante and source of comfort.

Despite their growing popularity and positive feedback, they do have their critics, every bit pointed out in The Times:

Sherry Turkle, a psychologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who has long studied how older people use technology. "The promise is that it becomes a companion and you have a relationship with it," she said of a robotic animal. "As though at that place's mutuality. In that location'southward not mutuality. It's a bunch of bits and bytes."

So there is Sister Imelda Maurer, with vast feel with elder care, who dislikes the notion of deceiving people who have dementia and may retrieve robots are bodily pets. "There's an element of upstanding dishonesty near it," she said.

Both Maurer and Turkle point out that the enthusiasm for robots spotlighted the many failings in the way our society cares for older people, whether in understaffed facilities or isolated at habitation.

Most people have embraced the value of therapeutic visitation dogs, many of whom are rescued from animal shelters and trained specifically to work as therapy dogs. While the practice has grown steadily, the need, sadly, outpaces the supply of volunteers. As long as that'south the example, perhaps robotic pets are the next best thing.

While some may run across them as a step toward further dependence on machines and computers for emotional well-existence, it is difficult to argue with the benign results. As we face up a growing and increasingly difficult social and medical challenge—providing our senior population with quality care—they may be a valuable tool.

Have you experienced either positive or negative furnishings of a robotic pet interacting with a family fellow member or friend? Nosotros'd love to hear from y'all about it!

Photograph credits

Courtesy of the Joy for All/Ageless Innovation Facebook (superlative, bottom)

Courtesy of parorobots.com (middle)

Source: https://thebark.com/content/can-robotic-dogs-substitute-therapy-animals

Posted by: arndtthemen.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Can Robots Used In Treatment Or Assistance Substitute For Animals?"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel